|
|
|
Return to Table of Contents for More Strategies After attending the On Course I Workshop this past summer, I wrote a case study (see below) that I used in my math class for elementary education students. The purpose of this case study is to strengthen students’ problem-solving abilities, and the experience went extremely well. First, I had students read the case study aloud. Then I had them respond to the questions on their own. After 10 minutes, I had the students get into groups according to the way that they numbered the people in the study. I had the students in each group explain to each other why they’d numbered the people in the study the way that they had, and then we had a lively discussion among the groups about their choices. Next, I asked students to come up with their own problem-solving strategies. I put them into seven groups of four students each. Two of the groups created identical strategies while the remaining five groups came up with different strategies. The groups all used a pattern approach to solving. Student groups shared their solutions with the whole class. They were excited to see that there was not just one way to solve a problem. Many of them had always been taught that, in math, there is only one way to get to a solution. Students did very well on the subsequent unit exam. The class average on the unit exam was 78 with a standard deviation of 9.2. Below the case study, you will find the student results on the exam questions that correlated with the problem-strategies of the case study. I also thought you might be interested to read some of the student responses to an evaluation regarding the value of doing the case study. Here is the case study: * * * * * PROBLEM
SOLVING Professor Penny thought her math class needed to spend more time problem solving. In an effort to enhance her students’ problem solving ability, she decided to put students into groups and give each group a different problem to solve. Professor Penny assigned each group the following tasks:
One group of students--Linda, Tom, Tony, and Cindy--were given the following problem to solve: Find the sum of the first 100 counting numbers. 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + 100 LINDA, anxious to get the work done, said that the group should break up the numbers into parts and each person should be responsible to add a set of numbers. TONY did not like the fact that Linda was already blurting out what they were going to do to solve the problem. He wanted time to think about all of the possible ways to solve the problem. “I think we should take the problem home and make a list of all of the possibilities.” CINDY did not like Tony’s idea. Cindy said, “This is exactly why I hate math! What does adding a bunch of numbers have to do with real-life? When am I ever going to use the sum of the first 100 numbers again?” TOM, an easygoing guy, felt that everyone was making too much of a fuss about the problem. He suggested getting a calculator and adding the numbers from 1 to 100 inclusive. That seemed like the best idea to him and it was easy to do. Linda then blurted out that if Tom wanted to do that he could but she was only going to add the first 25 numbers. She then told Tony that he would need to add the numbers from 26 to 50, Cindy would need to add the numbers from 51 to 75 and Tom would have to add the numbers from 76 to 100. She then proceeded to tell everyone that they needed to meet 1 hour before class started to put they results together so that they would have their answer ready for the class. Tony then told the group that he did not feel that they were completing the tasks that Professor Penny gave them. Linda told Tony that everything was under control. Tony could not seem to get his point across to the group. Tony then went to Professor Penny and explained the situation to her. She told him that part of becoming a good problem solver was to work through the group dynamic problem in addition to solving the given problem. Tony was furious with the professor’s response. He decided to solve the problem his own way. He came up with a list of strategies that he would use to solve the math problem. The next day, the group met 1 hour before
the start of class. Three of the members of the group added the numbers that
Linda had assigned, however, Tony did not add the set of numbers Linda assigned
him because he did not think Linda’s strategy was a viable one. Linda said
that she would handle running the presentation. Linda explained to the class the
breaking up strategy that she came up with, however they were unable to arrive
at a solution because Tony refused to participate. Tony then told the class that
he did not think that Linda’s solution was a viable one and that he felt it
best to look for patterns when trying to calculate a sum of numbers. Cindy hated
the assignment and let the class know that this was a stupid assignment, which
had no bearing on her life. Tom told the class to get out their calculators and
add the numbers from 1 to 100 inclusive and they would arrive at the correct
solution. Now, imagine that you were a member of this group. What would you have done to contribute to the group task? Do you identify with anyone in the group? Which student in the group completed the task at hand? Rank the students from 1-4. Note: A "1" indicates the student you feel did the best job of completing the tasks and a "4" indicates the student you feel did the worst job of completing the tasks. Be prepared to explain your answer. Linda ____ Tony ____ Cindy ____ Tom ____ Diving Deeper: Do you think Professor Penny should have helped the group after Tony came to her for help? In your groups: It is now your turn to come up with a strategy or a set of strategies to solve this problem. * * * * * Now, here’s an evaluation of the impact of doing the Case Study: The unit exam was designed to make students
use the problem solving skills they had practiced in the case study. While
many of the exam problems expected students to use their problem-solving
strategies, problems 4, 5, and 6 were specifically designed to test this skill.
The chart below summarizes the results.
Students could earn up to 5 points for each problem. Students were awarded 3 points for their strategy (explanation needed to be clearly stated), 1 point for their conclusion (again needed to be clearly stated), and 1 point for the correct answer. The good news is that each student tried the problems. In the past, I have had students leave problems blank when they did not know how to do a problem. The students’ responses were well thought out. I did note that 16 students scored 3 points on problem 6. Part of the problem required the students to think through a seating arrangement, but they had to follow a specific diagram. Every student in the 3-point category missed one instruction in the problem, thus leading them to an incorrect conclusion and final answer. I also sought feedback from the students about their experience with the case study. Here are the responses to my two questions: A. Do you think that the activity “A
Case Study” helped you to become a better problem solver? If yes, explain how.
If no, explain why it did not. (Responses – 7 No’s, 18 Yes’s)
B. Did
the activity help you to work more effectively in a group setting? Please
explain your answer. (Responses – 2 No’s, 23 Yes’s)
Jenny Penniman, Faculty, Mathematics, Howard Community College (MD), jpenniman@howardcc.edu * * * * * The ON COURSE NEWSLETTER publishes innovative strategies for helping students become active, responsible learners. To subscribe to this bi-weekly (monthly in the summer) e-newsletter, click here and send the resulting e-mail. No need to type anything. Our computer will automatically add your return address to the list of subscribers. You're always in charge of your subscription, with a subscribe/unsubscribe link in every newsletter. Have a best practice to share? Click here and request our publication guidelines. |