Data from On Course Programs

Home ] On Course Principles ] Student Success Strategies ] [ Data from On Course Programs ] Testimonials-On Course I Workshop ] On Course Newsletter ] On-Campus Workshops ] On Course (The Book) ] Skip Downing ] On Course Ambassadors ] On Course Student Essay Contest ] TCHG (Teaching) 6530-12 - Syllabus ] New Page 2 ] New Page 3 ] New Page 4 ] New Page 5 ]

 

Return to Table of Contents for Student Success Strategies

The On Course text is used in classes at more than 500 colleges and universities in the United States and Canada, helping to empower more than 100,000 students each year. Data reports are provided here from On Course programs at: 

bulletAurora University (IL)
bulletBaltimore City Community College (MD)
bulletBay de Noc Community College (MI)
bulletBrevard Community College (FL)
bulletBryant & Stratton College (OH)
bulletCentenary College (NJ)
bulletChaffey College (CA)
bulletCuyahoga Community College (OH)
bulletEl Camino College and Compton Education Center (CA)
bulletEl Camino College (CA)
bulletElgin Community College (IL)
bulletIllinois Valley Community College (IL)
bulletInver Hills Community College (MN)
bulletMission College (CA)
bulletMount Hood Community College (OR)
bulletNational Park Community College (AR)
bulletNortheastern Oklahoma A&M College (OK)
bulletParadise Valley Community College (AZ)
bulletRoane State Community College (TN)
bulletUniversity of New England (ME)
bulletUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro (NC)
bulletYork Technical College (SC)
 

Submit data from your On Course program by sending it to info@OnCourseWorkshop.com.

AURORA UNIVERSITY (Illinois)

The STAR Program at Aurora University provides support to conditionally admitted students to assist them in achieving their academic goals and success during their first year and beyond.

The STAR Program begins each year with a special four-day orientation specifically for the STAR students one week before the fall semester begins.  The orientation provides students an opportunity to adjust to life on campus before the other first year students arrive and prepares them for being a college student in and out of the classroom.  Students attend a variety of sessions and participate in activities that teach them everything they need to know in order to succeed in college.   

Some of the topics and activities that students experience during the orientation include:

bullet

The Aurora University (AU) General Education Program

bullet

College Classroom Fundamentals: The Lecture

bullet

College Classroom Fundamentals: The Science Lab

bullet

College Classroom Fundamentals: The Discussion

bullet

AU Technology: Moodle, E-mail, and WebAdvisor

bullet

Campus Scavenger Hunt

bullet

Scavenging in the Library

bullet

Wellness At AU

bullet

Evening Activities with the STAR Mentors

Students in the STAR Program also enroll in the course First Year Experience – Creating Success for College and Beyond during fall semester.  As participants in the course, students develop study strategies and make changes in the way they look at themselves and their lives as college students.

The fall course is designed to help students achieve success in college and in life by developing their study strategies and following the eight On Course program principles: personal responsibility, self-motivation, self-management, interdependence, self-awareness, lifelong learning, emotional intelligence, and belief in yourself.  The course meets once a week for 50 minutes during the 16 week semester.

The course was added to the STAR Program in fall 2008.  In addition to the course goals and purpose listed above, the other reason the course was added to the program was to provide regular contact between the STAR students and the STAR program coordinator.  Prior to fall 2008, the coordinator did not have regular contact with the STAR students except during the STAR orientation and through Academic Progress Reports from the faculty.  The course allowed the students and the program coordinator to stay in contact at least once a week during the class.  The addition of the course had a significant impact on the first semester GPA and the fall to spring retention of the STAR students who started in fall 2008.  Below is comparison data from the STAR program for students who started in fall 2007 without the course and the students in fall 2008, when the course was first offered.  

Comparison Data for STAR Program (2007 to 2008)

 

Fall 2007

Fall 2008 with On Course

Total STAR Students

41

31

AVG AU GPA

2.07

2.43

Highest AU GPA

3.73

3.67

AVG HS GPA

2.59

2.77

AVG ACT

18.46

18.35

Retention (fall-spring)

32/41 (78%)

30/31 (97%)

Retention (fall-fall) 21/41 (51%) 18/31 (58%)

Grade Point Ranges

Fall 2007

Fall 2008

.00 - .99

5 (12%)

0 (0%)

1.00 - 1.99

12 (29%)

8 (26%)

2.00 - 2.99

16 (39%)

15 (48%)

3.00 - 3.99

8 (20%)

8 (26%)

> 2.00

59%

74%

As the data reflect, students who started in the program in fall 2008 had a higher GPA (+.36) and first year fall to spring retention rate (+19%) than the students who started in fall 2007. 

As a result of the increase in GPA and retention, the students who begin the STAR program in fall 2009 will not only be required to take the fall course, but beginning spring 2010, they will also be required to take a course entitled, First Year Experience-Career Exploration for Personal Growth and Development during their spring semester.

The spring course will be designed to help students develop career goals and lay out a path for achieving these goals.  This course will continue the relationship that was developed between the students and the program coordinator during the fall semester.  During the spring course students will examine their own personal interests, aptitudes, values, decision making skills, academic plans, and career awareness. This personal, educational, and occupational information will then be organized into an individual course of action to help students in planning for their second year at Aurora University.  The course will meet once a week for 50 minutes during the 16 week semester.

If you have questions regarding the orientation, courses, or the overall content and structure of the STAR Program, you can contact Travis Ramage (STAR Program Coordinator) at (630) 844-5141 or tramage@aurora.edu.   

* * * * *

BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Maryland)

In Fall, 1999, students at Baltimore City Community College who placed in ENG 81 (the college's middle-level developmental writing course) were invited to enroll in a learning community comprised of ENG 81 and CSS 110 (College Success Seminar), a 3-credit orientation class that teaches students the 8 Success Principles found in the text On Course: Strategies for Success in College and in Life.  Students successful in these paired courses moved on together to ENG 82 with the same classmates and instructor.

Due to the impressive improvement of student retention and academic success in the Learning Community, the program was expanded in Fall, 2000, to include students taking developmental reading and mathematics. These students participated in Learning Communities that paired the College Success Seminar with RDG 81 and MATH 81. Successful students went on together in the learning community to take RDG 82 and MATH 82 in Spring, 2001. 

The data below show the positive impact of this program on the academic success and retention of developmental students. Three components of the learning community seem to contribute most significantly to the improvement in academic success and retention of these developmental students: 1) Students learned the On Course success principles and strategies in CSS 110, 2) Students had the guidance of a mentor who taught the CSS 110 class and coached them outside of class to apply the On Course principles and strategies in all areas of their lives, and 3) Students, during their first two critical semesters in college, felt part of a community of motivated and supportive fellow students.

***2000-2001 DATA***

Retention Rates for Developmental English Students

  Retention of Eng 81 Students NOT in the Learning Community (N=425) Retention of Eng 81 Students in the On Course Learning Community (N=33) Improved Retention in the On Course Learning Community
Fall '00 to Spring '01 63% 76% +13%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience continued to have a positive impact on the retention of developmental students in English 81.

Retention Rates for Developmental Reading Students

  Retention of Rdg 81 Students NOT in the Learning Community (N=401) Retention of Rdg 81 Students in the On Course Learning Community (N=28) Improved Retention in the On Course Learning Community
Fall '00 to Spring '01 64% 79% +15%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had a significantly positive impact on the retention of developmental Reading students.

Retention Rates for Developmental Math Students

  Retention of all Math 81 Students NOT in the Learning Community  Retention of all Math 81 Students in the On Course Learning Community  Improved Retention in the On Course Learning Community
Fall '00 to Spring '01 69% 90% +21%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had a significantly positive impact on the retention of developmental Math students.

Pass Rates for Developmental English Students

  Pass Rate of all Eng Students NOT in the Learning Community Pass Rate of all Eng students in the On Course Learning Community Improved Pass Rates in the On Course Learning Community
Eng 81 in Fall '00 55% 70% +15%
Eng 82 in Spring '01 49% 87% +38%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had an extraordinarily positive impact on the academic success rate of development English students.

Pass Rates for Developmental Reading Students

  Pass Rate of all Reading students NOT in Learning Community Pass Rate of all Reading students in the On Course Learning Community Improved Pass Rates in the On Course Learning Community
Rdg 81 in Fall '00 54% 71% +17%
Rdg 82 in Spring '01 52% 74% +22%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had a very positive impact on the academic success rate of development reading students.

Pass Rates for Developmental Math Students

  Pass Rate of all Math students NOT in Learning Community Pass Rate of all Math students in the On Course Learning Community Improved Pass Rates in the On Course Learning Community
Math 81 in Fall '00 28% 39% +11%
Math 82 in Spring '01 47% 56% +9%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had a positive impact on the academic success rate of development math students.

***1999-2000 DATA***

Retention Rates for Developmental English Students

  Retention of Eng 81 Students in a Matched Control Group (N=95) Retention of Eng 81 Students in On Course Learning Community (N=83) Improved Retention in On Course Learning Community Z-Test
Fall '99 to Spring '00 50.5% 77.1% +26.6% p<.01
Fall '99 to Fall '00 26.3% 49.4% +23.1% p<.05

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had a significantly positive impact on the retention of developmental students.

Pass Rates for Developmental English Students

  Pass Rate of Students NOT in Learning Community (N=95) Pass Rate Students in the On Course Learning Community (N=83) Improved Pass Rates in On Course Learning Community
Eng 81 in Fall '99 55% 78% +23%
Eng 82 in Spring '00 48% 72% +24%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had a very positive impact on the academic success rate of development students.

Three-Semester Cumulative Pass Rates for Developmental English Students

  Non-Learning Community Students (Starting N=434) On Course Learning Community Students (Starting N =83) Improved Cumulative Pass Rates in On Course Learning Community
Percent of the starting group who Passed Eng 81 in Fall, '99 Successful students = 240

54.5%

Successful students = 65

78.3%

+44%
Percent of the starting group who Passed Eng 82 in Spring, '00 Successful students = 96

22.1%

Successful students = 39

47%

+113%
Percent of the starting group who Passed Eng 101 in Fall, '00 Successful students = 29

6.7%

Successful students = 25

30.0%

+348%

Conclusion: The positive impact of the On Course Learning Community on student pass rates was compounded over successive semesters. After three semesters, On Course Learning Community students were 348% more likely to have passed English 101 than were non-learning community students who began Eng 81 at the same time.

Pass Rates for English 101

  English 101 Pass Rate for Non-Learning Community Students (N=854) English 101 Pass Rate for On Course Learning Community Students (N=34) Improved English 101 Pass Rate for On Course Learning Community Students
Fall '00 40.3% 73.5% +33.2%

Conclusion: The two-semester On Course Learning Community experience prepares students to continue doing well academically when they leave the Learning Community. On Course Learning Community students were nearly twice as likely to pass Eng. 101 in their first try than were non-learning community students, many of whom were taking English 101 for the 2nd, 3rd, or even 4th time.

* * * * *

BAY DE NOC COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Michigan)

Reported submitted by Professor Denise Dufek

Description of Course Numbers

FY 101 = College Success Strategies using On Course
MA 090 = Lowest Developmental Math
MA 100 = Development Math
EN 075 = Developmental Reading
EN 095 = Lowest Developmental English
EN 100 = Developmental English 

 

Fall 2009 FY Cohort
  Group FY Students Pass Rate Non-FY Students Increased Pass Rate for FY Students
  FY 101 134 68% -- --
Of Those Passing FY 101 MA 090 61 62% 59% 3%
MA 100 27 59% 59% 0%
EN 075 52 71% 49% 22%
EN 095 23 70% 38% 32%
EN 100 53 85% 66% 19%

 

Fall 2009 New Student Cohort
Group Students Returned Winter Winter Persistence Returned Fall Fall Persistence
Passed FY 75 72 96% 52 69%
Did not take/pass FY 736 614 83% 405 55%
Increased Persistence of FY Students -- -- 13%   14%

 

Winter 2010 FY Cohort
  Group FY Students Pass Rate Non-FY Students Increased Pass Rate for FY Students
  FY 101 75 63% -- --
Of Those Passing FY 101 MA 090 24 58% 54% 4%
EN 100 23 74% 67% 7%

 

Winter 2010 New Student Cohort
Group Students Returned Winter Winter Persistence Returned Fall Fall Persistence
Passed FY 28 20 71% 15 54%
Did not take/pass FY 248 137 55% 113 46%
Increased Persistence of FY Students -- -- 16%   8%

 

Fall 2010 FY Cohort
  Group FY Students Pass Rate Non-FY Students Increased Pass Rate for FY Students
  FY 101 234 65% -- --
Of Those Passing FY 101 MA 090 65 69% 49% 20%
MA 100 20 80% 57% 23%
EN 075 66 86% 38% 48%
EN 095 22 91% 45% 46%
EN 100 58 83% 58% 25%

 

Fall 2010 New Student Cohort
Group Students Returned Winter Winter Persistence Returned Fall Fall Persistence
Passed FY 123 112 91% -- --
Did not take/pass FY 594 456 77% -- --
Increased Persistence of FY Students -- -- 14%    

 

These early data suggest that, when Bay College students are successful in FY 101 College Success Strategies, they are more likely to be successful in their transitional courses and to persist into the following semester than are their peers who do not take or pass FY 101.

This is great news for the students and faculty of Bay College.

 

* * * * *

BREVARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Florida)

Reported by Professor Mark McBride, College-Wide Coordinator for Student Success

At Brevard Community College in Florida, we asked the following question of First-Time in College (FTIC) fall term college-prep (developmental) students and college credit students:

bullet

What were the retention rates of students who passed SLS 1101 [On Course class] with a "D" or higher compared to students who didn't take SLS 1101?

We looked to see if the target students enrolled in (1) the following spring term, (2) the following fall term, and (3) graduated by spring 2009. Here are the results:

FTIC College-Prep Students: From First Fall Term, 2004 to 2007

  Retention of Students who did NOT take SLS 1101 Retention of students who DID take SLS 1101 Increased retention of SLS 1101 (On Course) Students
Returned for following Spring Term 71.4% 90.17% +18.77%
Returned for following Fall Term 53.3%  68.5% +15.2%
Graduated by Spring, 2009 11.42% 17.12% +5.7%

 

FTIC College-Credit Students: From First Fall Term, 2004 to 2007

  Retention of Students who did NOT take SLS 1101 Retention of students who DID take SLS 1101 Increased retention of SLS 1101 (On Course) Students
Returned for following Spring Term 84.3% 91.42% +7.12%
Returned for following Fall Term 69.5% 82.1% +12.6%
Graduated by Spring, 2009 34.67% 45.2% +10.53%

* * * * *  

We also compared the Academic Success Rate of students who took Communications 1 (ENC1101) without SLS and those who did take SLS 1101:

  Academic Success rate of those who did NOT take SLS 1101 Academic Success rate of those who DID take SLS 1101 Improved Academic Success for SLS  (On Course) Students
Academic Success of Students in Communications 1 75.4% 88.4% +13.0%

For Com II (ENC 1102), the increased pass rate was 1.2% for SLS students.

We also compared the Academic Success Rate of students who took Intermediate Algebra (MAT 1022) without SLS with those who took SLS.

  Academic Success rate of those who did NOT take SLS 1101 Academic Success rate of those who DID take SLS 1101 Improved Academic Success for SLS  (On Course) Students
Academic Success of Students in Intermediate Algebra 63.4% 68.0% +4.6%

We also compared the Academic Success Rate of students who took College Algebra (MAT 1105) without SLS with those who took SLS.

  Academic Success rate of those who did NOT take SLS 1101 Academic Success rate of those who DID take SLS 1101 Improved Academic Success for SLS  (On Course) Students
Academic Success of Students in College Algebra 72.0% 82.1% +10.1%

 

  * * * * *

BRYANT & STRATTON COLLEGE (OH-Willoughby Hills Campus)

by Marcia Backos, Program Director

 
DAY SCHOOL           Fall, 2002                     (before On Course)      Fall, 2003 (with On Course)

Improvement in On Course Students

Retention of New Students 62.8% 64.0% +1.2%
Students with Perfect Attendance 2.9% 17.9% +15.0%
Advisor's Honor Roll (3.3-3.99) and Dean's List (4.0) 40.0% 50.0% +10.0%
EVENING SCHOOL           Fall, 2002                     (before On Course)      Fall, 2003                     (with On Course)

Improvement in On Course Students

Retention of New Students 59.1% 90.5% +30.4%
Students with Perfect Attendance 2.9% 14.3% +11.4%
Advisor's Honor Roll (3.3-3.99) and Dean's List (4.0) 41.0% 61.9% +20.9%

Conclusion: These data reveal the following significant outcomes after the full implementation of On Course

1. Retention of new evening students increased by 30.4%. Retention of new day students showed a slight improvement (1.2%) after three previous semesters of decline.

2. Both the day and evening students showed a significant increase (15% and 11% respectively) in students earning perfect attendance awards.

3. Academic achievement (GPAs of 3.3 or above) for day students improved 10% while evening students improved 20.9%

  * * * * *

CENTENARY COLLEGE (New Jersey)

From a report by Suzanne McCarthy, Director, Learning Support

We created two sections of our Academic Foundations course in 2007 specifically for undeclared majors and named it Major Discoveries.  We had thirty one students enrolled between the two classes and adopted On Course as our text and approach.

Course Experience

We followed the reading and journal writing schedule prescribed in the On Course Instructor’s Manual.  We complimented this with On Course interactive activities in class.   To help students better discover their own strengths and interests we had them complete the ACT Discover surveys and take the MBTI.  We conducted nine in-class information interviews with professionals from a variety of fields who work both on and off campus.  Each student was required to conduct three information interviews on their own as well as complete a half day shadowing experience in a work place.  These activities were followed up with a written reflection on each of these experiences and all of this was uploaded into an e-portfolio.

The final was an oral presentation with a power point or movie maker visual titled “My Next Steps.”  Many of these presentations were outstanding and truly reflected the self knowledge and the sense of empowerment they had acquired.  A sampling of statements in these presentations included:  “What I accomplish in college is up to me” and another student wrote “Make realistic goals.  Show up.  Make things happen.  Never settle for anything less then [sic] your best effort.”  Many commented on their experience of writing journals saying “It’s okay to feel big emotions.”  And it is “a good way to evaluate yourself.”

The Students

The group of 31 undeclared students included eleven who were provisional admits (“students whose credentials are insufficient for admission by the usual college standard may be given and opportunity to study” - Centenary College Catalog, 2007).  Additionally six of the enrolled students had accommodation letters from the Disabilities Service Office.

The Outcomes

At the end of the semester we reviewed their transcripts.  Nineteen students earned a semester GPA over a 3.0 including four with a 4.0, ten earned between a 2.0 and 3.0 and two failed to make minimum satisfactory academic progress.

As a group the undeclared students often seem “goal less.”  From a review of their final presentations it was evident that a few actually felt defined enough to declare a major.  For the majority they seemed to have a greater sense of self and possibility. Some  identified a general direction for study and work and others at least acquired the skill of how to explore a career path.  These students were empowered to be successful in their overall course load based on their first semester GPAs.  This was often demonstrated by their own vocabulary speaking of being creators and not victims, setting goals and managing their lives as students. 

Conclusion: A comparison of Centenary College's Undecided Freshmen first semester grades for the two years’ prior shows the 2007 group as a whole earned higher GPAs with the On Course program as the underpinning for their Academic Foundations course, especially in the 3.5-4.0 range.

YEAR

GPA 0-1.0

GPA 1.0-1.5

GPA 1.5-2.0

GPA 2.0-2.5

GPA 2.5-3.0

GPA 3.0-3.5

GPA 3.5-4.0

Fall 2005*

3%

0%

9%

13%

25%

28%

22%

Fall 2006*

5%

18%

9%

13%

5%

27%

23%

Fall 2007**

3%

3%

7%

16%

13%

26%

32%

* Undecided students were in various Academic Foundation courses

**Undecided students used On Course as text and curriculum 

* * * * *

CHAFFEY COLLEGE (California)

Excerpts from a document entitled "Opening Doors to Excellence Using On Course to Assist Students on Probation" submitted by Ricardo Diaz, Coordinator, Opening Doors

In spring of 2004, after an Accreditation review, one of the pressing recommendations made by the review committee was for Chaffey to address its enforcement of probation and dismissal policies and procedures. At the time, MDRC, a social and educational policy research organization, was interested in studying Chaffey’s Success Centers. Because the Success Centers were already well established and open to all students, MDRC and Chaffey administrators quickly agreed that they were not well suited for a research project that would randomly assign some students to a control group. However, MDRC and Chaffey representatives discovered there was mutual interest in developing a new intervention targeting students on academic and progress probation: approximately 3,500 in spring 2004, or about one out of every five students enrolled. 

The Opening Doors to Excellence program was developed through a collaborative design and development process funded by MDRC bringing together instruction and student services to target students on academic and/or progress probation. Targeted students are one semester away from being dismissed from the college if they continue on probation standing for a third consecutive term…. 

Students opting to participate in Opening Doors sign a contract agreeing to repeat specific courses that will help them improve their GPA, not drop classes without consulting a counselor, take a college success course, attend required Success Center visitations and meet with the program counselor to develop an education plan with the primary objective of regaining good standing and avoiding dismissal. During the counseling appointment, a one year educational plan listing courses, semester by semester, needed to regain good standing is developed. Prior to registering for the subsequent semester, participating students are required to submit a proposed schedule for the upcoming term. Opening Doors staff then clears a registration block authorizing the student to register at his or her designated time for the upcoming semester.

In the subsequent term, participating students enroll in the guidance class and other classes recommended by the counselor. The course “Opening Doors to Student Effectiveness” is a 3 unit, grade-earning, non-degree-applicable course using the text book by Skip Downing titled On Course. The curriculum developed with this book and special training through On Course seeks to promote “innovative learner-centered strategies” for empowering students to become active, responsible learners. In addition, students are required to complete five directed learning activities in any one of four Success Centers. Students can choose from writing, reading, multidisciplinary, and math Success Centers to complete directed learning activities that correlate with specific topics covered in the guidance class. The directed learning activities are mandatory and are weighed in the final grade earned by the student in the guidance class….

A follow up study completed by Chaffey’s Institutional Research Department examined the change in self-reported perceptions of well being across a range of affective indices before and after completing the guidance courses and receiving specialized counseling through the program. Instructors administered pre and post surveys to students in the fall 2008 and spring 2009 semesters before and after completing the course. The guidance course [using On Course] had a meaningful impact across all measured indices of well-being. In particular, both fall and spring cohorts showed a statically significant and dramatic increase in self-esteem (d= 1.22 & 1.48 respectively). The spring cohort also showed statistically moderate to substantial gain in the perceived value of their education (d =.42) and their self-reported educational participation (d=.86).

Finally, since the implementation of the enhanced version of Opening Doors that subsequently became the program institutionalized at Chaffey, the college has seen a steady decrease in the number of dismissed students. In fall 2007, the term the college began to fully implement it dismissal policy 750 students out of an 18,654 students enrolled were dismissed. This represents 5% of the student population for the term. In spring 2009, 505 students were targeted for dismissed action out of 19,953 students. This represents 2.5% of the student population being dismissed. In a two year period, the college has cut the percentage of dismissed students to enrollment ratio in half.

To read the entire document, click HERE

* * * * *

CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Ohio)

Excerpts from a Cuyahoga Community College Document entitled “Two Course Learning Community: Developmental Math and On Course” submitted by Donna McNatt, Faculty, Mathematics

Program Description

The math learning community attempts to increase students’ success by replacing their expectation that they cannot “do math” with the belief that they can pass their developmental courses and progress to college level study.   According to faculty who teach these courses, students who enroll in developmental math are handicapped less by their actual ability to learn the material than they are by the expectation that it is beyond their grasp.  Because they do not believe they can learn the material, they do not really try.  Under these circumstances, failure becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

To help students overcome these obstacles, the math learning community combines instruction in mathematics with material on personal responsibility and study skills.  Students who participate in this intervention enroll in two courses: MATH 0850 and MATH 0950.  In MATH 0850, students are taught to assume responsibility for their success and failures.  Using the “On Course” curriculum developed by Skip Downing, students are taught to see themselves, not as victims, but as creators.  They are taught to set goals, to manage their time, and to set priorities.  The math 0950 course instructs them in the concepts of beginning algebra.  The idea is that, by helping students to take responsibility for their actions and to obtain study skills, they will become more successful in their developmental math courses, and beyond. […]

Evaluation Design

To determine whether these interventions have had an impact on students’ success, an evaluation has now been conducted.  This evaluation has compared the performance of students enrolled in these interventions to a randomly selected, matched sample of students who were enrolled in MATH 0950 on each of these campuses during semesters in which the intervention was offered.  In selecting this sample, students were matched on age, GPA as of the start of the semester, and hours earned as of the start of the semester. […] 

Evaluation Results

[…] Looking at data on students enrolled in fall 2007, 54.4% of the students who enrolled in the learning community completed MATH 0950 with a grade of C or better. By contrast, 42.6% of those in the comparison group successfully completed this course.  The fall-to-spring persistence rate for students in the fall 2007 cohort was 75.5% (74 out of 98).  This compares to a rate of 66.0% (62 out of 94) for students in the comparison group. […]

Fall, 2007 Students taking Math 950 without Math 850 (On Course Class) N=94 Students taking Math 950 with Math 850 (On Course Class) N=98 Increase for students taking Math 850 (On Course Class)
Passing Grades of A-C 42.6% 54.4% +11.8%
Fall-Spring Persistence 66.0% 75.5% +9.5%

Survey Results

In addition to the “hard data” on students’ academic performance, a survey was also administered to students who participated in the MATH 0950 learning communities during fall 2007.  This survey sought to find out whether the on-course material covered in MATH 0850 had any effect on students’ confidence that they could succeed in their math courses. Questions on this survey attempted to determine whether the course as a whole had an effect on students’ sense of confidence.  Questions also sought to determine the impact that specific course content had on students’ confidence in mathematics. 

Results of this analysis were quite positive.  Of the 23 students who responded to the questionnaire, 91% (21 students) said that they were somewhat or much more positive about their chances of succeeding in math than they were at the beginning of the semester.  Students were also quite positive in their opinions on the impact that specific course content will have on their ability to succeed.  The survey contained 8 items designed to find out whether students felt that a particular content area was likely or unlikely to affect their success in math.  Students who responded to these items overwhelmingly felt that these content areas will help them to succeed in their math courses.  The percentage of students who felt that these content areas would likely or very likely affect their math success ranged from 65% to 100%, with the percentage exceeding 90% in six of the eight areas. [...]

  * * * * *

EL CAMINO COLLEGE and COMPTON EDUCATION CENTER (California)

Report submitted by Kristie Daniel-DiGregorio, Rose Ann Cerofeci, and Donna Manno, drawn from research by Irene Graff, El Camino College, CA

As one of the first campuses to adopt the use of On Course, El Camino College (ECC) has invested nearly two decades in developing innovative applications of the On Course principles. These efforts have transformed faculty and student learning, our campus, and our larger community.

The Program

The Faculty Inquiry Partnership Program (FIPP) commenced in 2009 and was funded through Fall 2011 with generous support from El Camino College's Basic Skills Initiative and from the WalMart Student Success Initiative. A total of five faculty cohorts participated in On Course workshops held on campus, incorporating 125 faculty representing two campuses, all academic disciplines, and programs for first-generation students such as EOPS, Puente, and FYE. Participants completed an on-campus On Course I workshop, during which cross-disciplinary partnerships were formed. Each FIPP pair collaborated to implement at least five On Course strategies into their teaching and into campus-wide leadership initiatives. The program coordinators designed monthly On Course-related workshops, extensive reporting and assessment tools, a faculty handbook, video testimonials, and a website featuring more than 300 OC-related strategies from all disciplines. Through the 125 FIPP participants, the program continues to affect thousands of students and hundreds of faculty in faculty development initiatives for campus-wide Flex Day, Basic Skills, FYE, Title V Learning Teams and others. Many of the 22 ECC and all of the 20 ECC-Compton OCAs were recruited through FIPP. 

Outcomes

Pre- v. Post-FIPP comparisons convey the significant impact On Course has had on faculty, students and the campus. More than one year after completing the program, 97% of faculty continued to utilize two or more On Course strategies in their teaching and 42% reported using six or more strategies. Eighty-one percent are still in contact with their partners. Nearly all of the faculty participants (99%) reported that FIPP positively impacted their teaching. The program is associated with modest but consistent increases in student success. Student success rates after instructors attended FIPP were 2% higher than before their involvement in the program. After the program, FIPP participants reported statistically significant increases in the level of active learning by their students and in their own satisfaction in dealing with difficult student behaviors and negative student attitudes. They also reported significant decreases in the occurrence of difficult student behaviors and negative student attitudes. Among students, 91% responded that the On Course-related strategies helped them understand the material and increase their interest in content; 92% reported the strategies would contribute to their success as a student.

  * * * * *

EL CAMINO COLLEGE (California)

Report submitted by Kristie Daniel-DiGregorio and Juli Soden, El Camino College, CA

Data excerpted from Arata, H. and Graff, I. (September, 2010) “Facilitating Active and Responsible Learning: Human Development Courses Utilizing the On Course Principles,” El Camino College Office of Institutional Research.  For complete study, http://www.elcamino.edu/administration/ir/research.asp.

Human Development 10 (HD10) is a three-unit transferable course which provides an exploration of cognitive, psychological, social and physical factors influencing success in college and in life.  Every year since Fall 2007, sixteen sections of the course (enrolling approximately 300 students) have utilized the On Course text.  In Spring 2009, a study was implemented to the determine the success of students in courses utilizing On Course, relative to those who did not experience the On Course curriculum.

Self-Assessments

In Spring 2009, 152 HD10 students completed the On Course pre and post self-assessments.  The results below show statistically significant differences in pre- and post-assessments for all but one domain.  

Post and Pre Test Results, (Max = 80, Min = 0)

Domain

Pre Test

Post Test

Growth

Sig.

Pre

SD

Post

SD

1 Personal Responsibility

55.44

1.70

65.98

0.63

10.54

*

2 Discovering a Motivating Purpose

56.21

1.29

63.97

0.84

7.76

*

3 Planning and Taking Effective Actions

52.06

0.71

58.71

0.53

6.65

**

4 Building Mutually Supportive Relationships

47.30

1.71

51.13

1.84

3.83

 

5 Gaining Heightened Self-Awareness

50.02

0.33

59.77

0.23

9.75

***

6 Becoming a Life-Long Learner

45.49

0.50

59.54

0.46

14.05

***

7 Developing Emotional Maturity

49.03

1.13

55.75

1.07

6.72

***

8 Believing in Myself

54.95

0.74

61.01

0.87

6.06

***

Total Average

51.31

1.02

59.48

0.81

8.17

 

P value less than the significance level of 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), and 0.001 (***)

Academic Outcomes

More than 1,000 students across four terms of HD10 were studied, with those experiencing the On Course curriculum compared with those who did not.  On Course students were slightly more successful in math overall, but less successful at the basic skills and transfer levels (see below).  However, On Course students attempted more transfer math classes than non On Course students.  On Course students performed best at the college prep, pre-transfer level with success and retention rates 10 points higher than the non On Course group.

Math Success and Retention Rates by With Comparison

 

On Course

No On Course

Diff. (OC - No OC)

Math Level

Success

Retention

Success

Retention

Success

Retention

Basic Skills

48%

79%

55%

80%

-7

-1

College Prep

51%

74%

41%

65%

10

10

Transfer

65%

79%

71%

76%

-6

3

ALL Math

52%

77%

51%

74%

1

4

A similar pattern was found for English but to a lesser degree where On Course students were more successful in English classes overall compared to Non On Course students, but were slightly less successful at the basic skills level.  On Course students showed the greatest success at the college prep level whose rate was 11 points higher than the non On Course group; retention was also high at 90% for this level. 

English Success and Retention Rates by With Comparison

 

On Course

No On Course

Diff. (OC - No OC)

English Level

Success

Retention

Success

Retention

Success

Retention

Basic Skills

57%

82%

59%

78%

-2

4

College Prep

68%

90%

57%

81%

11

9

Transfer

69%

85%

69%

81%

0

5

ALL English

66%

87%

61%

80%

5

7

On Course students, overall, had higher rates of passing transfer-level course in math and English than Non On Course students when tracked for two years after the HD 10 course. 

Goal Achievement – Percentage Passing Transfer-level Math & English within Two Years

Transfer Courses/ Goal Achievement

Percent Passed Transfer MATH

Percent Passed Transfer ENGLISH

On Course

19%

52%

No On Course

16%

47%

 On Course student GPAs remained above 2.00, while the non On Course group dipped just below a C average. 

GPA Changes Over Time

GPA Period:

Pre-HD 10

At Last Term

Difference     (Post-Pre)

On Course

2.20

2.05

-0.15

No On Course

2.19

1.99

-0.21

Both

2.20

2.03

-0.17

 By the end of the HD 10 course using On Course, students improved in their self-perception on seven of the eight domains associated with students who are “active and responsible learners.”  The results associated with On Course suggest that participants have become better students by maintaining a GPA above 2.0,  succeeding in math and English at higher rates, overall, and passing through transfer-level courses in these subjects more quickly.

While many factors contribute to whether or not students are successful in their college courses, it is unclear why On Course students outperform non On Course students in only the pre-transfer college prep courses, rather than across the board in all levels of English and math.  This issue will be examined more closely in future studies of HD10.

  * * * * *

Elgin Community College (Illinois)

from a report by Dr. Mary Perkins, Associate Dean of Enrollment Management

In fall 2008, Elgin Community College adopted On Course as the text in a college success course that is required for all first-time, full-time students. The course has been a requirement at ECC since fall 2006. This one-credit course is called College Success, or COL 101, and its purpose is to guide students through their transition to college by learning essential success skills.  Approximately 1,200 new students enroll in this course annually.  There are approximately 80 sections annually taught by approximately 50 instructors.  Instructors teaching COL 101 must complete training annually and are provided with a number of tools and resources to ensure the course is taught consistently and with high quality.

Analyses of student retention show students who complete COL 101 are significantly more likely to return the following term [22%-29%] and year [28%-34%] than those who did not enroll.  In addition, students who successfully complete the course are more likely to return than those who completed earning grades of D, F, or W. 

Conclusion: The On Course approach to student success has a positive impact on the retention of new students.

Dr. Perkins summarizes the results as “Having taught this course using a study skills text previously and watching my students use the On Course text now, I am convinced that we are focusing on what they need.  The topics of personal responsibility, self-management, self-awareness, self-motivation, and interdependence are issues that ALL students, regardless of ability level, are challenged with when they transition to a college environment.  Moreover, the improvements in student success are compelling.”

  * * * * *

ILLINOIS VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Illinois)

by Marianne Dzik, Dean, English, Mathematics and Education

 
Retention Comparison: First-time, Full-time Student Cohorts (Based on 10th Day Enrollments)
2000/Fall Cohort Retention Rates for all first-time, full-time students Retention Rates for students registered in SFC 1000     (On Course)

Improvement in On Course Students

Fall '00 - Spring '01 85.4% 88.1% +2.7%
To Fall, '01 65.7% 69.0% +3.3%
to Spring, '02 58.2% 60.7% +2.5%
to Fall, '02 26.7% 44.0% +17.3%

 

Retention Comparison: First-time, Full-time Student Cohorts (Based on 10th Day Enrollments)
2001/Fall Cohort Retention Rates for all first-time, full-time students Retention Rates for students registered in SFC 1000  (On Course)

Improvement in On Course Students

Fall '01 - Spring '02 86.8% 92.0% +5.2%
To Fall, '02 67.2% 71.6% 4.4%
to Spring, '03 61.1% 64.8% +3.7%
to Fall, '03 30.8% 48.9% +18.1%

Conclusion: The impact of the On Course program on retention became most pronounced in students' fourth semester. There, retention of On Course students was 17-18% higher than retention of students not in the On Course program.

  

  * * * * *

INVER HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Minnesota)

by Brenda S. Landes, IHCC Counselor

Inver Hills Community College is a commuter campus located in a suburb of St. Paul , MN , enrolling approximately 5,000 full-time and part-time students each academic year.  Beginning fall semester 2007, all full-time students enrolling in college for the first time were encouraged to participate in one of three new retention initiatives:  1) On Course – a one-credit freshmen year experience class based on the Skip Downing text, 2) a Learning Community comprised of 2 or more integrated courses, or 3) a Learning Community with the On Course class as one of the integrated courses.   Approximately 23% (392 out of 1697) of all new, full-time students were involved in one of these three retention strategies during this first semester, with a higher proportion of males, students of color, first generation and low-income students participating when compared to the general population of first time students.   

Research conducted by Danielle Ricard, IHCC Office of Institutional Effectiveness, shows significant improvements in the retention of students participating in these retention strategies when compared to the general population of new students.  These increased retention rates hold true from fall semester to spring semester, but also from fall 07 to fall 08 (see charts below).

Based on the positive results during 07-08, Inver Hills expanded the overall number of On Course sections offered from 17 during fall 07 to 25 in fall 08.  The college has also expanded the number of Learning Communities in which On Course is one of the embedded classes from 4 to 10 sections during fall semester 2008.

Since the implementation of the 1 credit On Course class in fall 07, approximately 1200 students have enrolled and successfully completed this “first-year experience” class. 

 

* * * * *

MISSION COLLEGE (California)

by Dr. Jonathan Brennan, Chair, Department of English

In Fall, 2001, Mission College began a learning community program similar to the successful one at Baltimore City Community College (see report directly above). The Mission College program linked eleven basic skills classes (English, Reading, ESL, and Mathematics) with On Course counseling classes. Whereas the BCCC learning community program is two semesters, the Mission program is one semester.

Following are the retention and academic success data from the Fall, 2001, semester of this program. Note that data for all eleven basic skills classes are reported together (rather than for separate courses).

Retention Rates for Mission College Basic Skills Courses

  Retention of All Basic Skills Students NOT in the On Course Learning Community Retention of All Basic Skills Students in the On Course Learning Community Improved Retention in the On Course Learning Community
Fall, 2001 65% 87% +22%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had a positive impact on the retention rate of basic skills students.

Academic Success Rates for Mission College Basic Skills Courses

  Academic Success Rate of All Basic Skills Students NOT in the On Course Learning Community Academic Success Rate of All Basic Skills Students in the On Course Learning Community Improved Academic Success in the On Course Learning Community
Fall, 2001 45% 62% +17%

Conclusion: The On Course Learning Community experience had a positive impact on the academic success rate of basic skills students. The classes have demonstrated higher retention and success. Faculty members have commented that they are energized and excited by the opportunity to work with the On Course strategies. They also use their On Course strategies in a range of other classes and workshops, including athletics, EOPS workshops, transfer, motivation and other workshops, Orientation, counseling classes, and many others. I have also used them with my own colleagues in professional development presentations, especially for new faculty. The students in On Course classes are actively involved in finding solutions to their problems, and in applying their new strategies to their Mathematics, English, and Reading classes."

To read the entire Mission College report (which includes details of how they set up their learning communities), CLICK HERE.

  * * * * *

MOUNT HOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Oregon)

by Sharon Juenemann, Learning Skills Specialist 

At Mt. Hood Community College, we recently adopted On Course as the primary text for our one-credit freshman seminar course (HD 100: College Success).  The adoption of On Course was part of an institution-wide initiative to increase student persistence.  While HD 100 has been offered at our college for many years, this year was unique.  First, the course was offered for free, and faculty/staff across the campus were recruited to teach the course.  Our college president even taught a section!  Second, advisors actively recruited new students into the course.  Finally, faculty and staff teaching the course had a one-day On Course training in which faculty learned about the On Course Principles, focusing on Self Responsibility, Self-Management, Self-Motivation, Interdependence, and Lifelong Learning. We also provided follow-up training for faculty and staff through Houghton Mifflin, publisher of On Course.

Data on student persistence from Fall 2004 to Winter 2006 was collected via our student data management system.  Below are the results:

Retention Rates for Mount Hood Community College First-Year Students

  Retention of All First-Year Students NOT in HD 100, the On Course Class (N=9451) Retention of All First-Year Students in HD 100, the On Course Class (N=458) Improved Retention in the On Course Class
Fall 2004 to Spring 2005 53% 80% +27%
Fall 2004 to Fall 2005 28% 54% +26%

By all accounts, the effort was a wildly successful effort, with students from the On Course group persisting 27% more the following term than students not taking the freshman seminar.  We also conducted a survey of students taking the course and approximately 75% of students responded that the On Course text was either “helpful” or “very helpful.”

This improvement in persistence is even more impressive when other factors, such as student drop-out proneness, are considered.  The Noel-Levitz College Student Inventory was administered to all sections of HD 100 in Fall, 2004.  On a scale that is correlated with factors contributing to increased drop-out risk, 30% of students in the experimental group scored at or above the 90th percentile.  This is many times higher that the equivalent amount in the comparison group whose results are distributed in a bell curve pattern with relatively fewer students scoring in the extreme ranges.

Our institution continues to offer HD 100 tuition-free to all first-year students.  Our goal is that nearly every incoming MHCC student will take the course so that all MHCC students can experience the successes that On Course students do.  

  * * * * *

NATIONAL PARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Arkansas)

by Dana Murphy, Chair, Learning Accelleration 

Retention Data for first-time, full-time Students who took Success Seminar using On Course

Cohort Semester Students enrolled in first-year class(es) Number retained one semester Retention % for one semester Number retained one year Retention for one year Graduation Rates for the same period
Fall, 2003 471 348 74 245 52 6%
Fall, 2004 338 341 76 230 51 6%
Fall, 2005 428 319 75 213 50 9%
Fall, 2006 487 356 73 263 54 9%
Fall, 2007 418 318 76 226 54 18%
Fall, 2008 479 422 88 287 60 29%
Fall, 2009 611 550 90+ 378 62 28%

For the fall semester, 2000, National Park Community College created a one-credit hour FYE course titled Success Seminar. All first-time full-time students were required to enroll in the class, which was offered in the first five weeks of each semester. Students who were placed in two or more transitional classes (for remediation) were also required to take College Study Skills. For three years, the instructors of the course changed textbooks (using first Becoming a Master Student, then POWER Learning, and finally Cornerstone). In the summer of 2003, the supervising instructor for all FYE courses attended the On Course I Workshop. Since that time, the On Course movement has become part of our culture at NPCC. Thirteen instructors have attended OC I, and two have attended OC II. NPCC has hosted three OC workshops on its campus. 

Through the adoption of the On Course textbook and involvement with the OC movement with workshops and conferences, NPCC has made a commitment to student success that goes beyond its campus. NPCC used its Success Seminar as a pillar for its work with Achieving the Dream. Success Seminar instructors are engaged state-wide with initiatives for student success, serving on committees for our two-year college organization, in TRIO programs, and in state-wide Achieving the Dream initiatives. And, we continue to change and grow our FYE course as we identify challenges to student success.

In spring 2010, NPCC adopted a two-credit hour FYE course in response to the strong retention and persistence numbers for its Success Seminar. In addition, we adopted the Study Skills Plus edition of On Course. (Our College Study Skills course was eclipsed by this two-credit hour course.) All full-time entering students now receive instruction in the eight choices of successful students as well as study skills. We hope to pilot a one-credit hour FYE course for part-time students (who have the largest achievement gap of any group on our campus) by fall, 2011.

UPDATE ADDED 11/10/12

National Park Community College increased fall to spring retention of Pell Grant recipients in their student success course from 60.5% (average 2004-2007) to 73.8% in 2010- 2011. This improvement is associated with their first year success course called College Seminar that is required for all full-time, degree-seeking students. The success of the College Seminar course stems from a redesign of the course to utilize cooperative learning strategies, the On Course curriculum, and a module on fiscal responsibility. The course has also been scaled up to reach 85% of the College's students.

* * * * *

NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA A&M COLLEGE (Oklahoma)

by Tom Hale, Counselor

In Fall, 2004, the Title III Program at Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College conducted a study to compare the academic success and retention of two groups of first-time basic skills students, all enrolled in three courses: Reading (CIED 0133), Basic Composition (ENGL 0123), and College Life and Success (SOSC 1213). College Life & Success is a course required for any student who has 3 or more academic deficiencies, but it can be taken as an elective by any student.

The primary difference between the two groups was the text used in the College Life and Success course. The goal of the study was to determine if the different texts created a discernable difference in students’ academic success and retention.  Academic success was defined as a student passing the basic skills class. Retention was defined as a student registering for classes in the following semester.

GROUP 1 (ON COURSE CL&S) was comprised of 43 students who had the three classes in common. The four CL&S classes in this group used the text On Course by Skip Downing. Students for the experiment were chosen at random during spring and summer enrollment. There were an additional 29 students in the On Course sections of College Life & Success who did not need or did not take the Reading and Basic Comp classes.

GROUP 2 (OTHER CL&S) was made up of 33 students who had the three classes in common. The four CL&S classes in this group used another popular student success text. There were an additional 57 students in the “Other" sections of CL&S who did not need or did not take the Reading and Basic Comp classes.

  Other CL&S Students On Course CL&S Students

Improvement in On Course Students

Passed Reading 67% 89% +22%
Passed Composition 67% 71% +04%
Retention 73% 96% +23%

Conclusions: 

1. Students who used the On Course text achieved significantly better academic success in Reading and slightly better academic success in basic composition than students in the control group.

2. Students who used the On Course text demonstrated significantly better retention than students in the control group.

* * * * *

PARADISE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Arizona)

The full report can be accessed at the PVCC web site by clicking HERE.  (Then click on "Fall 2007 iStartSmart - Summary of Results - printable one-page document")

Retention Rates for Paradise Valley Community College Students

  Retention of All PVCC Students NOT in AAA/CPD 115 or CPD 150, the On Course Classes. Retention of First-Semester Students in AAA/CPD 115 or CPD 150, the On Course Classes (N=679) Improved Retention in the On Course Classes
Fall 2007 to Spring 2008 57% 74% +17%

[NOTE: Students not in the On Course classes include all other students at the college; thus, many in the non-On Course group have been at the college for multiple semesters and might be expected to have a higher retention rate than first-semester students in the On Course group.]

679 students enrolled in a college success course (AAA/CPD 115 or CPD 150), both of which use the On Course text. 

    86% of the students agree or strongly agree that the course has better prepared them for success in college and in life.

    88% of the students agree or strongly agree that the course has helped them to improve their self-management skills.

    86% of the students agree or strongly agree that the course has helped them to learn how to take charge of their lives.

    84% of the students agree or strongly agree that the course has increased their self-motivation.

    83% of the students agree or strongly agree that the course has increased their self-awareness. 

* * * * *

ROANE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE (Tennessee)

Roane State Community College in Harriman, Tennessee, implemented a Study—Organize—Succeed course in Fall 2010 known as COLS 1010. The course is three-credit hours and it is a free class. Students use the 6th edition of On Course. Due to funding from a FIPSE grant*, students are able to check out the text from Roane State’s library and use it for the entire semester. The curriculum is supplemented by the requirement that students use three specific learning strategies. Students apply two of the strategies (graphic representations in the form of concept cards and two-column note-taking) in one or more classes they are taking concurrently with the COLS 1010 class. The third strategy, keeping an organized notebook, is applied in the COLS 1010 class.

Preliminary retention data is provided in the chart below. The term “Gateway Enrollees” refers to students who were enrolled in one of the six following courses: Developmental Reading, Developmental Writing, Development Math at the Intermediate level (which is the terminal developmental math course), Composition I, Human Anatomy and Physiology I, and College Algebra. These six courses were selected by Roane State as gateway courses during the development of the school’s Quality Enhancement Plan, an improve student learning initiative.

As the chart denotes, retention rates for the students who took COLS 1010 class are significantly higher than both categories to which they are being compared. The course continues to be offered for free and nine sections are slated for spring 2012. The school will continue to track the retention data for at least three more years.

*Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) awarded Roane State Community College the grant Study Skills Spell Success
(P116Y090010) in October 2009. Sarah Thomason is the Project Director. Additional information about the grant may be found at http://fipsedatabase.ed.gov.

Retention Data Comparison Chart

  RSCC Overall Gateway Enrollees with concurrent COLS (On Course class) Improved retention 
Fall 2010 to Spring 2011 79.5% 88.2% +8.7%
Spring 2011 to Fall 2011 64.5% 81.3% +16.8%
  Gateway Enrollees with No Present or Past COLS (On Course class) Gateway Enrollees with concurrent COLS (On Course class) Improved retention 
Fall 2010 to Spring 2011 82.1% 88.2% +6.1%
Spring 2011 to Fall 2011 61.9% 81.3% +19.4%

 

* * * * *

UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND (Maine)

by Lorraine Shire Pecchia, Learning Specialist

LAC 030 OpportUNEties for Success has been taught for four consecutive semesters with increasing student interest and enrollment.  The table below reflects GPA and academic standing.  In summary, LAC 030 is an elective course and has contributed to the academic success and increased GPA of the students it enrolls.  Attending the On Course training in May/June 2009 has added to my confidence and pedagogy in teaching the course and adopting the textbook (by the same name) for the curriculum.  I teach the full nine chapters in fifteen weeks.  The 90% average persistence rate of LAC 030 students is higher than that of the University’s 77% for first-time full-time undergraduates entering Fall 2008  (taken from Report on Undergraduate Persistence and Graduation Rates at UNE).  The two students who were placed on Academic Probation after taking the LAC 030 course had been on Probation prior to taking the course.  This is also true for the two students who were academically dismissed.

 

Students enrolled

in LAC 030

Headcount

Pre-cumulative

GPA(non-first-time freshmen)

Post – cum GPA of All

Academic Standing

Good

Academic Standing

Dean’s List

Academic

 Standing

Dismissal

Academic

Standing

Probation

Persistence Rate

(enrolled 2

consecutive semesters)

 

Fall 2008

16

2.66

N=8

2.82

10

5

1

0

94%

Spring 2009

6

3.1

N=5

3.1

5

1

0

0

84%

Fall 2009

19

2.2

N=5

2.86

12

5

0

2

95%

Spring 2010

9

1.74

N=8

2.17

6

1

1

1

89%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student Testimonials from  “Personal Philosophy of Success” final papers  

bullet

“While college started off as a struggle, I finally feel now like I stand a better chance at doing well.  This semester my grades have greatly improved and soon I will be off academic probation.  I am very fortunate to have taken the LAC 030 class because it has helped me to be a better student by finding strategies that work for me.”

bullet

“This semester I have been able to bring my grades up drastically due to the things I have learned in OpportUNEties for Success.  Now that the year is almost over I can see, be going over my tests to help me study for my final, that I have been improving each time in every class.  I can now be confident that my long term goals of improving my grade point average each semester and graduating college on time will be accomplished.”

bullet

“I could see my improvement on critical thinking questions in my LILH class.  The tests would consist of fill-in-the-blanks and critical thinking questions.  From the beginning until the end of the year my critical thinking (responses) went from being two out of four (points) to four out of four (points).”

* * * * *

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA at GREENSBORO (North Carolina)

from a report by Cindra Campoff, Retention Coordinator

In Fall, 2001, UNC Greensboro adopted On Course as the text in an academic success course that is required for all students who are placed on academic probation after their first semester. This non-credit course is called Strategies for Academic Success, or SAS 100, and its purpose is to help students on probation gain the success skills they need in order to return the next semester. To be eligible to return the next semester, a student must earn at least a C+ average for that term. A student receiving lower than a C+ average is suspended and must sit out at least one full semester from UNCG.  Approximately 300 students each spring semester and 50 students each fall semester are required to take SAS 100.

Before adopting the On Course text, SAS 100 attempted to retain probationary students by teaching them academic study skills. According to a report on the course by Cindra Kampoff, UNCG retention coordinator, “Students didn’t like it, they didn’t do well in their other courses, and we had a difficult time keeping instructors. Most of all, the course wasn’t really addressing why students were placed on probation. They were reporting non-academic reasons for their probation status, yet we were feeding them only academic success strategies."

In the Fall 2001 semester, course leaders adopted the On Course text, with its emphasis on motivating and empowering students to become active, responsible learners. Since that time, Professor Kampoff reports, “Due to the change in curriculum and the implementation of the motivational and empowerment model, our retention rates for these students have continued to increase each semester.”

In Fall, 2004, the UNC-Greensboro Retention Program using On Course won two prestigious awards: the Noel-Levitz Retention Excellence Award and a Program Excellence Award from the National Academic Advising Association (NACADA).

Improved Retention Rate of UNC Greensboro Students on Probation

  Probationary students in SAS 100 eligible to return to UNCG when the course provided instruction only in study skills Probationary students in SAS 100 eligible to return to UNCG after adopting the On Course text with its emphasis on empowering students (as well as addressing study skills) Improved retention of probationary students after adoption of On Course.
Fall Semesters '00 vs '02 53% 72% +19%
Spring Semesters '00 vs ''03 40% 57% +17%

Conclusion: The On Course approach to student success had a positive impact on the retention of students on probation.

Professor Kampoff summarizes, “The retention results and changes in students’ hope and optimism levels [mentioned elsewhere in her report] display the effectiveness of the On Course curriculum and structure of SAS 100. I am convinced that teaching On Course topics such as personal responsibility, self-management, self-awareness, self-motivation, and interdependence address the underlying reasons that students are on academic probation. Breaking away from the traditional approach of teaching a straight study skills curriculum is not easy, but the data is compelling to say the least.”

To read the entire University of North Carolina Greensboro report, CLICK HERE.

* * * * *

YORK TECHNICAL COLLEGE (South Carolina)

Report submitted by Taunya Paul, Department Chair, Developmental Studies, York Technical College, SC

In Fall, 2011,

 
Fall 2011 First-Time Freshmen in Degree or Diploma Programs
  Successfully Completed COL 101/103 Did Not Successfully Complete Col 101/103 Improved retention of probationary students after adoption of On Course.
Retained/Graduated Fall 2012 337 (55%) 132 (31%) +24%
Not Retained/Graduated Fall 2012 271 (45%) 289 (69%)  
Total 608 421  

 

* * * * *

You can receive weekly e-mails with strategies for helping students become active, responsible learners. To subscribe to the ON COURSE NEWSLETTER, simply click here and send the resulting e-mail.  You don't even have to type anything. Our computer will automatically add your return address to the On Course Newsletter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 








 

 

 

 

11/6/11

Hit Counter